/lit/ - Literature

When will someone buy and reupload one of (cosmoetica) Dan Schneider's books so the rest of us can critique it?

https://www.amazon.com/stores/author/B0794FTXM3/allbooks?ingress=0&visitId=7570bde2-fdcc-4d15-8f35-8c6c6bd38e50&ref_=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_5

I like him as a critic, all of the classic books he recommended seemed good to me. On the other hand it feels like he's overhyping his own books and his wife's books.

>2023
>I am forgotten
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdaRYBA9cyY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2aAhW8EonU

Why aren't you reading Dan Schneider, the best poet of all time? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5ckHgjs6HQ

>>12721202

>Dan "The Banana Man" Schneider

How will pine cone fags ever recover?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_2IwfWGs-Y

Can anyone surpass him /lit/?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJrj7WvTt8Y

How is he?

is it just me or is op a sociopath

https://youtu.be/-_2IwfWGs-Y
Is he right?

>>11059421
>man who watches anime can appreciate aesthetic experiences

Why is nobody talking about Dan “writes better than Proust can” Schneider?

"It was in the green torso of the canyon, where the soul of another dream rotted, that Pauly Marrivelli first felt that he was something more than just a hood. It was in this dream, perhaps, first dreamt not long after the end of The Great War, that Pauly decided to veer, ever so slightly from his then unswervable plan to be the most powerful and feared Mobster in the nation. The canyon walls of the wilderness he wandered in pulled back, and creaked with anxiety, even though this was part of the lucid control Pauly had learnt to exert in such dreams. Yes, this was the same dream he had first dreamt, all those decades earlier, but it was also more. He had learnt control of the harshness of first encounter in dream by building a little encampment and filling it up with soft ideas. It was like taking his childhood teddy bear- Elmer, the one he stole from Billy Brannigan, and using it as sort of an ambassador to monstrosity. Softness, sweetness, goodness- all these things would slowly snooze away as a stream gurgled beyond, and the pooling of fluids formed a small lake where nothing but breeze dared disturbance. Here, all things internal and not rested before engagement, again. Animals came to graze and gaze at the human population of one, which was rent into many animae.
To the lip of dream came many creatures of the wood, to sate a thirst, to diminish a dark self that was estranged from the fingers of light that inevitably splayed through the moment. The pellicle of this pool was green, algae laced, yet vibrant. Like oil, there seemed to be a retinue of colors, each squabbling to be made chief in the memory. Pauly was there, but not, his head trying to direct the flow of events from without, even as all was within. The forst sloped up from the edge of the pond, as fronds and dead leaves crept toward water. Extending the earth, at the expense of liquid moment was the sole purpose of all dream, or so Pauly intuited.
Fine, slender geass, of the kind that would make Walt Whitman moan and release, spangled the scene, and opposing all this was a thickness of anticipation, for few were the players in this scenes. Was this in 1918 or decades later? Was it an old man's loss or a young man's dream that propelled the events into replay? Rocks rose into canyon, and the edges of sky were forbidden- by what or whom, and why, was no matter. There was a wonder and invitation to fiat, especially in forbidding. Still, no view of the earth's proper edge was allowed, so dream filled in dream, or maybe it was just speculation- does the fact that a thing has several layers mean that it is not whole in any one sense?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gogMKtFEMeY

I've just recently been making my way down the rabbit hole that is Cosmoetica. What is /lit/'s opinion of this site and Dan Schneider; the madman that runs it. He certainly likes himself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJrj7WvTt8Y

>>10822605
>'peanut butter suckers' in other words they dip them in peanut butter and lick the peanut butter off
op wtf

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_2IwfWGs-Y

Who the fuck is this guy? How can you miss the point this hard of Pynchon? Hell he hardly even talks about him and just rants about DFW the whole time. I looked him up and he seems like the king of brainlets who think they know everything about literature.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07913GB4Q

Literally who the fuck is this person and why have all my friends starting citing his shit from Cosmoetica?

>/lit/ hasn't heard of the greatest poet to ever live
Not surprising, considering he has BTFO every pseud memed on here.
Joyce BTFO:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdHdDEiexbY
Pynchon BTFO:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_2IwfWGs-Y
DFW BTFO:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwauudA6MNY
Bloom BTFO:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tavz-teRK5Y
Now read the real master:
http://www.cosmoetica.com/Sonnets.htm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdaRYBA9cyY

What does /lit/ think of literary critic Dan Schneider?

http://www.cosmoetica.com/

His review of Infinite Jest: http://www.cosmoetica.com/B326-DES266.htm
His review of Gravity's Rainbow: http://www.cosmoetica.com/B1277-DES888.htm
His review of To The Lighthouse: http://www.cosmoetica.com/B318-DES258.htm

Dan Schneider claims to have written 1500 genuinely great poems. By comparison, the greatest published poet of all time, Rainer Maria Rilke, has only 77: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJrj7WvTt8Y

This makes Dan Schneider a literary genius the likes of which the world has never before seen. Hard to believe? Read his poems and judge for yourself: http://cosmoetica.com/Poetrylinks.htm

I'd link a specific one, but that shouldn't matter, as they're all supposedly great. His wife, of course, is the second greatest poet of all time: http://www.cosmoetica.com/Jessica%20Schneider.htm

He also likes to improve poems written by other authors by cutting out unnecessary lines. He performs such excisions on such beloved greats as Yeats, Eliot, Keats, Frost, Ashbery and plenty of others: http://www.cosmoetica.com/TOP.htm

For some examples of his criticism, see him take 2/3 of the meme trilogy to task:

http://www.cosmoetica.com/B1277-DES888.htm
http://www.cosmoetica.com/B326-DES266.htm

He's a bit kinder to Ulysses, but also considers it extremely overrated, and feels that the film adaptation is superior: https://web.archive.org/web/20111006165411/http://www.noripcord.com/reviews/film/bloom

He also does interviews with various people, but I'll only link to this one with famed anime voice actor and Star Trek fan film director Vic Mignogna, which I found quite surreal: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEFwT-ko9Ac

In a similar vein, here are Dan Schneider's thoughts on Dan Schneider: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8IdJ83GP5cg

So, what are /lit/'s thoughts? Have we all been missing out on a once-in-a-millennium genius, or is he just a phony? BTW I am not Dan Schneider, but you can assume I am if you want to.

Dan Schneider claims to have written 1500 genuinely great poems. By comparison, the greatest published poet of all time, Rainer Maria Rilke, has only 77: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJrj7WvTt8Y

This makes Dan Schneider a literary genius the likes of which the world has never before seen. Hard to believe? Read his poems and judge for yourself: http://cosmoetica.com/Poetrylinks.htm

I'd link a specific one, but that shouldn't matter, as they're all supposedly great. His wife, of course, is the second greatest poet of all time: http://www.cosmoetica.com/Jessica%20Schneider.htm

He also likes to improve poems written by other authors by cutting out unnecessary lines. He performs such excisions on such beloved greats as Yeats, Eliot, Keats, Frost, Ashbery and plenty of others: http://www.cosmoetica.com/TOP.htm

For some examples of his criticism, see him take 2/3 of the meme trilogy to task:

http://www.cosmoetica.com/B1277-DES888.htm
http://www.cosmoetica.com/B326-DES266.htm

He's a bit kinder to Ulysses, but also considers it extremely overrated, and feels that the film adaptation is superior: https://web.archive.org/web/20111006165411/http://www.noripcord.com/reviews/film/bloom

He also does interviews with various people, but I'll only link to this one with famed anime voice actor and Star Trek fan film director Vic Mignogna, which I found quite surreal: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEFwT-ko9Ac

In a similar vein, here are Dan Schneider's thoughts on Dan Schneider: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8IdJ83GP5cg

So, what are /lit/'s thoughts? Have we all been missing out on a once-in-a-millennium genius, or is he just a phony? BTW I am not Dan Schneider, but you can assume I am if you want to.

You're in pizza palace meeting with your literary club when this guy walks up to you and slaps your manuscript with a searing but objective critique.

What do you do?