/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.20565850]

>tell me you're a midwit tradlarper without telling me you're a midwit tradlarper

[Anonymous No.20565852]

Nobody knows who they are.

[Anonymous No.20565881]

>>20565850
I've never read any of these authors' books.
As a side note, what's your obsession with tradlarping? The people of the modern age are rootless, and there is no way to form roots without first larping. Everyone larps until it becomes genuine. Fake it 'til you make it as they say.

[Anonymous No.20565885]

>>20565850
>Schmitt, Heidegger
>trad
Farfetched, both are very ”modern” thinkers, and destroying the philosophical tradition in order to unearth factical life doesn’t seem very ”trad” to me

[Anonymous No.20565897]

>>20565881
My obsession with larping in general is that I find it highly inauthentic to not practice what you preach. As far as I'm concerned, you're more than welcome to subscribe to any worldview you like, as long as you yourself live by it.

If you don't, you're a fraud, and nobody cares about frauds

[Anonymous No.20566001]

Remove Heidegger, add Spergler

[Anonymous No.20566004]

>>20565850
you seem lost. maybe redd1t is better 4 u?

[Anonymous No.20566007]

>>20565897
What's your highly authentic worldview?

[Anonymous No.20566012]

>>20566007
Doing what you believe in

[Anonymous No.20566083]

>>20565850
Why are you butthurt anon? Who made you seethe and cope that much that you had to make a special thread about authors you never read?
Is your basedbrain confused as for why people would read Schmitt? Why people would read Heidegger? Have you actually picked up a book or did you just skim over the Wikipedia page, seen that they are LE Opposite color on the reddit political compas and decided that they are LE bad?

Thank you for telling me that you're a midwit litlarper without telling me you're a midwit litrarper

[Anonymous No.20566089]

>>20566083
OP struck a huge nerve

[Anonymous No.20566116]

>>20565850
Guenon predicted this.

[Anonymous No.20566119]

>>20565897
It's not possible to live a traditional lifestyle in a modern society. Sure, it's possible to move onto land far from the city, but how long until urbanites pass laws restricting your ownership of animals or rezone your land? How long until taxes are so high a corporate job becomes necessary and the illusion of traditionalism disappears?
My grandparents were farmers and found out the hard way that it's impossible to escape the effects of modernism on a traditional lifestyle. Just four streets away from me a man is being forced to sell his entire flock and farm because the city wants to build a subdivision on his land.

[Anonymous No.20566145]

>>20566089
Iv been following him for days, maybe weeks, months even.
Every Heidegger thread, every time Schmitt is mentioned. Someone posts Guenon or Evola, and there he is. His call, "tradlarper", can be found. Female shoes, but a male gait, yes, this is it.
Every time he replies that Heidegger only wrote something about Dasein. That Schmitt was just a nazi apologetic. That Evola was retarded and doesn't understand metaphysics (he indeed was a retard who didn't understand metaphysics, but for a different reason).
Every time I call him out, and every time he escapes.
Now, I have him in my sight, he won't escape this time

[Anonymous No.20566155]

>>20566145
God be with you and good hunting.

[Anonymous No.20566157]

>>20566119
>>20565881
Alright bros so since existentialism failed and because it was built on flawed premises anyways where do we go from here? We know that the traditionalist, born in an age of capital and democracy, cannot be authentically traditional. What's next?

[Anonymous No.20566173]

Just call everything a larp is quite literally not an argument.

[Anonymous No.20566189]

>>20566145
How did evola not understand metaphysics?
ive never read him

[Anonymous No.20566191]

>>20566157
You can be authentic in any society, time or culture
Thing is that you need to define yourself not according to other but to yourself, literally "choose your values" as Nietzsche said, exit "das Man" like Heidegger said, "strip naked before God" as Kierkegaard wrote.
It doesn't matter what you do, each life is unique and there is no set patter or set or rules and values that will make your life worth living (something the Stoics didn't realize), all it takes is that you realize that the world around you is inauthentic, that you are lost in this world. Once you find yourself as being lost, now you need to find yourself, stip your identity from from the expectations of other, look at the body and situation God gave you, and just do what you enjoy doing any moment of your life.
https://youtu.be/mW0-J47-Rgs

[Anonymous No.20566199]

>>20566191
K and how do you know youre truly doing something that is not externally conditioned, rather than acting on subconscious impulses that are still the product of external conditioning?

[Anonymous No.20566214]

>>20566199
>K and how do you know youre truly doing something that is not externally conditioned, rather than acting on subconscious impulses that are still the product of external conditioning?
Conscience, anxiety, and despair
You are constantly moving on the horizon of authentic and inauthentic life, every time you move towards authenticity you will eventually settle for a level of despair and conformity that is acceptable to you. The goal is to be moving, to not be inert.

[Anonymous No.20566225]

>>20566199
That's a dagger reserved for egoists.
>>20566191
You can't be authentic in a modern society unless all of your motives and actions are thoughtless and driven purely by the pleasure of thr moment. Buy tbe funkopops, watch the new movie, support the current thing.
If you really are saying "do what you want to do," then no one is larping. Everyone is doing exactly what it is they want to do- if their ideal is to be a person who cooms and listens to gang rap while preaching God and traditionalism, they're still doing exactly the thing that they want to do. They are realizing their own motivations and acting on their own desires.

[Anonymous No.20566229]

>>20566157
Marxism-Leninism,subvert modernity

[Anonymous No.20566233]

>>20566189
afaik he saw metaphysics as spiritual beings, like ghosts, and not meta-physics as in the branch of philosophy that deals with the first principles of physis, beings and Being. You can believe in ghost and spiritual beings like Angels, but that's not metaphysics.

[Anonymous No.20566251]

>>20566191
That’s why I said existentialism failed, it isn’t a real answer. People that are traditionalists want to attain to truths and values that are permanent, transcendant, and outside of themselves. Nietzsche and friends were all coping with the death of mass belief in permanent values and knowledge. An individual making shit up ex nihilo, without cultural, metaphysical, religious sanction is the very stuff of LARPing, the real meaning of that term.

[Anonymous No.20566259]

>>20566225
>You can't be authentic in a modern society unless all of your motives and actions are thoughtless and driven purely by the pleasure of the moment.

The human body is unique and divided, is it composed from the eternal and the temporal, from the spiritual and the eartlhy, from the body and the spirit and mind; it is composed of the religious, ethical and aesthetic. Just like the human body so its life is composed of several antithetical stages that often conflict with each other. An esthete is one who lives for his aesthetic, guided by his senses and bodily lust, longing constantly for new pleasures, passing from experience to experience in attempts to satisfy the needs of his spirit. The esthete deals only with his personal position in the world, and since aesthetic pleasure are short-lived, the esthete does not have a solid framework from which to make coherent, consistent choices that would help him build his "I", his soul, his authentic self. Such a life, as Kierekgaard writes, is lost in the details, not in the absolute. It is impossible, therefore, to take care of oneself; one uninterrupted life in the moment, after which no one and nothing remains. But even a corrupt life can lead to a person maturing, even if mentally they are still children. The main importance in the aesthetic life is the overcoming boredom and indifference, of which only death is worse, and thus can help someone realize his level despair. Every drug eventually looses its effect, the hedonistic threadmill is real.

[Anonymous No.20566262]

>>20566233
Actually both are true

[Anonymous No.20566268]

>>20566229
So this guy is some sort of nazbol? Can i get a QRD

[Anonymous No.20566274]

>>20565850
Schmitt is good the rest are ones I barely care about

[Anonymous No.20566281]

>>20566233
I read Evola a long time ago and i honestly dont recall him ever talking about metaphysics in that way. Might have to reread him for that

[Anonymous No.20566287]

>>20566251
>An individual making shit up ex nihilo, without cultural, metaphysical, religious sanction is the very stuff of LARPing, the real meaning of that term.
Thats French existentialism and Nietzsche, Heidegger and Kierkegaard recognise the geworfenheit/how God made you, your thrown and inescapable situation (from stuff like your parents, bad genes, the time you were born. etc.) Thats the only base you can build a meaningful life on, since everything else is a cope or Larp. Guenon larped as a Muslim, a tradition completely foreign to him and he always felt like a stranger for sure. Evola larped as a long-forgotten caste of warrior-aristocrats, something outside his time, and Im sure that he, in his old age, frail and without teeth, thought the same as Guenon.

[Anonymous No.20566300]

>>20566274
Schmitt is great when you look at who he influenced, his political theology is fundamentally flawed but that allowed Kant-orowicz to build an actual analysis of medieval political theology (which then influenced Foucault, but he didn't understand him as far as I care)

[Anonymous No.20566311]

>>20566287
I existentialism I'm shaky on, decent moral solutions, bad ideological backing

[Anonymous No.20566320]

>>20565850
Heidegger is coo shut up

[Anonymous No.20566324]

>>20566311
Existentialism really should be seen as a form of therapy and not a instant solution, being concerned about your authenticity is already a big leap from not being concerned about your shitty life at all
Imagine growing old and dying without realizing that you had a life to live

[Anonymous No.20566325]

>>20566287
Wouldn’t that just mean that traditionalism is impossible then? If you’re submitting to your thrownness or whatever and finding authenticity in that that means you’re submitting to liberal capitalism

[Anonymous No.20566406]

>>20566325
>Wouldn’t that just mean that traditionalism is impossible then? If you’re submitting to your thrownness or whatever and finding authenticity in that that means you’re submitting to liberal capitalism
I believe that Heidegger would agree with the notion that you can be traditional inside your time.
For example, let's look at Jesus as someone who was authentic. In his work he didn't deny the customs or laws of the Jewish people, of of the Roman Empire. Another example could be Alexander the Great, who was ready to invade Persia but first went to ask the oracles at Delphi for guidance. He dragged her out until she screamed something on the line "Let me go! You can't be stopped" which was enough for Alexander. He could have easily gone against the traditions of his time since it wasn't necessary for his beings as a warrior and conqueror, but he still went to see the oracles.
Despite our freedom to do as we want we are still cultural beings and determination will rely on the way the world is, including the way das Man, ie our „current year“ configures it for us. Even when I have become authentic and the object of my concern is not in others, I am not separated from others because my actions and concerns will involve understanding the capabilities of others as well as my own capabilities. Authentic Dasein is set up and acts always depending on the possibilities inherent in its current situation in the world.
In the second half of Being and Time Heidegger concludes though the analysis of being-towards-death that for authenticity determination is the key factor. In the anticipatory determination the ontological being-towards-death is therefore no longer just mortal in the ontic, everyday sense of the moment of biological dying, but instead, being-towards-death now involves reconfiguring your life after this realization, after realzing that our actions and choices have no transcendent foundation or justification. This is the goundlessnes that the orange lad talks in that video. Heidegger wants to point out here that there is no authority to act other than one's own will, just like Nietzsche, and the authentic anticipation of death leads the Dasein to give up duties, obligations, rules, values, which he no longer considers binding and valuable. But what Heidegger also says is that authenticity is not just a psychological result of a private subject choosing his inner attitude towards the world and himself, but authenticity is an effort to bring about true change in society and the world.
So, for Heidegger in Weimar Germany that meant joining the NSDAP. For me and you, I honestly dont know.
If you are religious, like Kierkegaard, reading the holy books is the only true tradition somoene should follow, but to be religious it needs to be effortless.

[Anonymous No.20566422]

>>20566406
im not reading this

[Anonymous No.20566426]

>>20566422
eh suit yourself, you're on a board about reading after all

[Anonymous No.20566434]

>>20566406
Bruh i aint readin all that

[Anonymous No.20566435]

>>20566426
I cant read

[Anonymous No.20566447]

>>20566422
>>20566434
>>20566435
I tried to make it interesting

[Anonymous No.20566457]

>>20566447
Ok I lied I did read all of it

[Anonymous No.20566468]

>>20565850
The two Latins are retards, Heidegger is irrelevant, and Schmitt is fine.

[Anonymous No.20566472]

>>20566457
I love you

[Anonymous No.20566525]

>>20565850
Heidegger is a phil 101 subject and Guenon is important in mainstream comparative religion, should be replaced with Spengler and de Maistre.

[Anonymous No.20566542]

>>20566468
>Heidegger is irrelevant
He kinda shaped modern continental philosophy, and with Rorty more and more analytics are studying him.
>and Schmitt is fine.
Sadly its mostly commies writing about him

[Anonymous No.20566589]

>>20566406
Jesus did criticize the Jews and their practices. He's the original "Le RETVRN larper"
At that time in history Jews practiced their own manmade creation and not what Jesus decribed as the actual (biblical) Law. He argued for a return to traditional piety.

[Anonymous No.20566617]

>>20566012
What do you believe in? Detail your worldview larper

[Anonymous No.20566650]

>>20566406
>you can be traditional inside your time.
Le tradition of listening to celebrities, watching the Kardashians and playing le MMOs. Return to le BASED tradition!

[Anonymous No.20566668]

>>20565850
The criticism "LARP" is toothless because people do become what they pretend to be.

[Anonymous No.20566697]

>>20566300
Kantorowicz's King's Two Bodies is a must read for me, but I'm spending time with the Greeks again. Books like Fustel de Coulanges' Ancient City gives a good notion of ancient political theology. Hence I'm surveying political theology more or less chronologically. Perhaps I will move to Dumézil on Rome, but I'm very eager to read Kantorowicz on medieval political theology. I think that knowing about the medieval age would help, that's why I thought about reading Marc Bloch's book on it first. What do you think? And do you think that reading Schmitt before Kantorowicz helps to get the points the latter makes?

[Anonymous No.20566700]

>>20566542
Philosophy is not relevant to real life.

[Anonymous No.20566732]

>>20566668
>tradlarper is so busy justifying his inane behaviour he ends up inadvertedly arguing in favour of trannies

[Anonymous No.20566752]

>>20566700
>Philosophy is not relevant to real life
Lmao, imagine living in a post-french revolution, post Soviet Union, post-modern world and think that philosophy is irrelevant

[Anonymous No.20566769]

>>20566752
>postmodern world
no such thing; metanarratives have not been defeated in any sense

[Anonymous No.20566771]

>>20566732
It's closer to something like willing to escape one's own time and circumstances. The affinity you're seeing is something closer to something like attempting to manhandle the demiurge with Marx & friends or the progressives. Troons are just sexual fetishists, completely irrelevant and a joke

[Anonymous No.20566784]

>>20566542
Is Derrida worth the read?

[Anonymous No.20566789]

>>20566769
>no such thing; metanarratives have not been defeated in any sense
I see, trannies, polyamory and faggots have been a core stepping stone of western tradition for centuries

[Anonymous No.20566801]

>>20566789
Homosexuality, promiscuity, and transsexualism all predate postmodern philosophy and the increased mainstream acceptance of these things has nothing to do with dense French texts.

[Anonymous No.20566816]

>>20566801
Yeah, and the Soviet Union had nothing to do with dense German texts

[Anonymous No.20566845]

>>20566816
correct

[Anonymous No.20566861]

>>20566199
In order to be externally conditioned would require that the external conditions contain a meaning in themselves, but since everything is nothing to me, there is no external condition outside the one I give. Who would be their measure? As to whether this is truthful or not, I seek no higher justification because that in itself would be my condition and my slavery.

[Anonymous No.20566869]

>>20566233
Ontology is a sub-category of metaphysics, so Evola's technically using the term correctly.

[Anonymous No.20566889]

>>20566771
that's really a pathetic excuse considering your attempts to escape the present ended up in you posting on an anime forum

[Anonymous No.20567091]

>>20566422
why are you even here

[Anonymous No.20567098]

>>20566650
>>20566732
>>20566700
why can you not engage seriously and strawman? is it because you're mentally pozzed? spiteful?

[Anonymous No.20567222]

>>20565850
Heidegger is not a tradfag, he pretty much created the post-humanist movement which is the exact opposite of the traditionalist cope

[Anonymous No.20567248]

>>20567222
you're getting there…

[Anonymous No.20567382]

>>20567098
leftists aren't actually interested in discussion, big surprise eh?

[Anonymous No.20567390]

>>20566889
not an argument

[Anonymous No.20567436]

>>20567382
https://youtu.be/kPPgFa0MfEU

[Anonymous No.20567469]

Guenon essentially refuted everyone.

[Anonymous No.20567625]

>>20566784
Of course, but you don't need to read more than grammatology to get his point.

[Anonymous No.20567634]

>>20566173
this is a larp

[Anonymous No.20568132]

>>20567382
nope, not surprising, but what confuses me is why they would come here in the first place because they just don't even read books

[Anonymous No.20568206]

>>20566157
History is going to define our era as the era of climate change and identity politics. That's going to be the part of our contribution to the cosmos that's recorded.

[Anonymous No.20568232]

>>20568206
>climate change is... LE BAD

[Anonymous No.20568234]

Read Dugin

[Anonymous No.20568275]

>>20568232
Get your head out of your ass. I said it'll define the history of our time, nothing about what it is inherently. Not everything is an affront to your shitty politics. The fact that the cultural war concerning climate change lives rent free in your head proves my point.

[Anonymous No.20568276]

>>20568206
we know from Traditional knowledge that there are global climate catastrophes when cycles of time change, we are in such a period, and the global elites are probably aware of this, and are just using it as an excuse to seize more power.

[Anonymous No.20568286]

>>20568276
Literally who tf cares dawg

[Anonymous No.20568289]

>>20568275
>climate change is... LE IMPORTANT

[Anonymous No.20568300]

>>20568286
people who aren't spiritual africans

[Anonymous No.20568308]

What is certain is that Guenon was far and away the superior thinker compared to Evola.

[Anonymous No.20568315]

>>20568308
how does one determine the relative value of one piece of garbage to another?

[Anonymous No.20568320]

>>20568308
Guenon wasn't really a thinker

[Anonymous No.20568321]

>>20568308
Gooin' on deez nuts iykwim

[Anonymous No.20568324]

>>20568315
a relevant question for ur negroid parents

[Anonymous No.20568328]

>>20568324
I come from a pure lineage.

[Anonymous No.20568337]

>>20565897
But I actually am muslim..

[Anonymous No.20568348]

>>20568328
no you don't nigger

[Anonymous No.20568350]

>>20568337
that's a shame

[Anonymous No.20568357]

>>20568350
>t. Shaytan

[Anonymous No.20568364]

what Heidegger has to do with all this

[Anonymous No.20568410]

>>20568348
projection

[Anonymous No.20568421]

>>20565850
le epic INTJs

[Anonymous No.20568426]

>>20568337
Larper, post timestamped Koran and prayer mat within 10 minutes.

[Anonymous No.20568430]

>>20568421
How is Traditionalism perceived as "INTJ" in your mind?? In what way does Ni Te Fi Se encapsulate the traditionalist view???

[Anonymous No.20568437]

>>20568410
>profane retard implies i am a nigger
lel shut up nigger

[Anonymous No.20568443]

>>20568426
Even David Wood has a Qur'an and probably has a prayer mat. Instead I will tell you what no LARPer knows: the underlying theme of Surat Al-Kahfi is time travel.

[Anonymous No.20568448]

>>20568437
you will never be white

[Anonymous No.20568460]

>>20568448
I'm Scottish and blond and my clan was colonized by Vikings 1100 years ago, you're a profane brown turd.

[Anonymous No.20568467]

>>20568460
>Scots
>white
ur a celtoid lmao

[Anonymous No.20568500]

>>20568430
Deez nutz

[Anonymous No.20568501]

>>20568467
>brown retard thinks it can decide what is white

[Anonymous No.20568506]

>>20568500
A typical lettertard BTFO by JVNGIAN CHAD

[Anonymous No.20568513]

>>20568506
MBTI is Jung but retarded

[Anonymous No.20568517]

>>20568501
>celtoids accusing nordics of being brown
amazing

[Anonymous No.20568526]

>>20568517
You aren't a nordic, you're a LARPing shitskin or a tranny. Prove me wrong.

[Anonymous No.20568536]

>>20568526
I drink fjord water every morning.

[Anonymous No.20568540]

>>20568513
contemporary jungianism: Dude, like we are all one, dude, like have you ever tried DMT?
JVNGIAN ANALYTICAL TYPOLOGY: I jsut found the meaning of life through esoteric functional analysis and I didn't even need hallucinogenics to aid me.

[Anonymous No.20568545]

>>20568536
too bad you have brown hands and are profane. go back to africa, dog.

[Anonymous No.20568556]

>>20568545
Take your meds schizo.

[Anonymous No.20568580]

>>20568556
you don't belong in white countries, brown turd.

[Anonymous No.20568591]

>>20568580
>endless seething because I called tradfaggots garbage

[Anonymous No.20568606]

>>20568591
it just proves you're spiritually not white, some shade of brown, maybe a semite

[Anonymous No.20568633]

>>20568606
>follows an Italian who deliberately got hit in an air raid and was obsessed with Indians
>rages against others as nonwhite

[Anonymous No.20568667]

Heidegger is not trad, please read before posting

[Anonymous No.20568709]

>>20568633
That's not really an argument, and he was more obsessed with Hermeticism.

[Anonymous No.20568745]

>>20568709
seethe Evoloid

[Anonymous No.20568751]

>>20568745
you will never be white, you will never be a woman, you will always be an inferior brown turd.

[Anonymous No.20568761]

There is a massive influx of non whites on this board.

[Anonymous No.20568768]

>>20568324
>>20568328
>>20568348
>>20568410
>>20568437
>>20568448
>>20568460
>>20568467
>>20568501
>>20568517
>>20568526
>>20568536
>>20568545
>>20568556
>>20568580
>>20568591
>>20568606
>>20568633
>thread about "trad" authors
>devolves into /pol/cels calling eachother brown
Every fucking time.

[Anonymous No.20568771]

>>20565850
Missing Unabomber

[Anonymous No.20568772]

>>20568761
Not really. Go to the hand thread and see that this is a white board, but as always the self-hating whites are disproportionately loud. There are probably also a couple of seething kikes in the mix, but they're fewer than you'd think.

[Anonymous No.20568778]

>>20568771
Unabomber is a neo-luddite (anti-technology), not a "trad".

[Anonymous No.20568780]

>>20568751
deranged

[Anonymous No.20568785]

>>20565885
Heidegger's a reactionary modernist.
He's not deconstructing the tradition to make room for the genesis of a new philosophy or a new interpretation of being. He's deconstructing the tradition to seize hold of the original concept of being.

[Anonymous No.20568843]

>>20565850
Intelligent people have trouble reading Heidegger (let alone midwits).

[Anonymous No.20569051]

>>20566422
>>20566434
>>20566435
>/lit/

[Anonymous No.20569109]

>>20566406
>n his work he didn't deny the customs or laws of the Jewish people
Stopped reading there. Have you ever read the Gospels? The parable of the old cloth? The old wineskin?

[Anonymous No.20569126]

>>20568768
another productive discussion on literature.com

[Anonymous No.20569136]

>>20565850
>tell me you're an apathetic projecting larper with no views whatsoever whose personality consists of baiting people online to pass the time without telling me that you're an apathetic projecting larper with no views whatsoever whose personality consists of baiting people online to pass the time

[Anonymous No.20569163]

>>20566233
This post just made me realize how little everyone here knows, even about my favourite meme authors. All of this posturing... And for what?

[Anonymous No.20569201]

>>20569136
>tell me you're a midwit without telling me you're a midwit

[Anonymous No.20569215]

>>20565850
Only Guénon is trad from that image, Evola was influenced by modern german philosophy and the other two fags were modern philosophers so not trad.

[Anonymous No.20569218]

>>20565850
>Evola, Gueunon, Schmidt, Heidawatshisname
>"Traditionalist"
>Nigga get on my level pic related.

[Anonymous No.20569221]

>>20565897
There are plenty of traditionalists who practice what they preach, and when anti-traditionalists are confronted with this, they still cry “LARP”.

[Anonymous No.20569225]

>>20565881
No, exceptional people who found the movements that grant normal people roots DO believe in all the shit they spew—that's what makes them exceptions.

No one has any roots in the modern world because modernity destroys roots faster than they can creep into the soil. Advocating a 'grounding' movement is the equivalent of incrementalists in the Pre-Soviet marxist period: a fundamental misunderstanding of the principles that they're attempting to apply. We're on a one way track to armageddon, all our efforts should be focused on that, whatever it might turn out to be; trad-larping is nothing more than a distraction that doesn't even provide the comfort that historic roots would traditionally have given; it would like trying to be a patriarch without having a family.

[Anonymous No.20569231]

>>20566447
Use paragraphs, retard. If I see a single huge block of text which isn't properly spaced I assume it was written by a retard/esl who doesn't properly understand the topic.

Repost it and just use

a lot more

space.

[Anonymous No.20569241]

>>20569201
>tell me you're an apathetic projecting larper with no views whatsoever whose personality consists of baiting people online to pass the time without telling me that you're an apathetic projecting larper with no views whatsoever whose personality consists of baiting people online to pass the time

[Anonymous No.20569269]

>>20569241
>tell me you're a fag without telling me you're a fag

[Anonymous No.20569278]

>>20569269
>tell me that you're a desperate projecting loser without telling me that you're a desperate projecting loser

[Anonymous No.20569354]

>>20568785
Yes and that is exactly not ”trad” in the sense of Evola and Guenon who thinks that tradition and truth is perennial

Heidegger can be compared to T S Eliot

[Anonymous No.20569358]

>>20565885
The philosophical tradition is counter-tradition. Tell me you haven't read Guenon without telling me.

[Anonymous No.20569524]

>>20566406
Thank you kindly for your effortposting, please disregard the illiterate niggers.

[Anonymous No.20569582]

>>20566406
>But what Heidegger also says is that authenticity is not just a psychological result of a private subject choosing his inner attitude towards the world and himself, but authenticity is an effort to bring about true change in society and the world.
You're not "authentic" unless you're trying to change the society? That's a rubbish take, and sounds more like political recruitment than serious philosophy.
>you have to fight in the culture war!

[Anonymous No.20569631]

>>20566406
>for Heidegger in Weimar Germany that meant joining the NSDAP
But what was the purpose of those making the NSDAP? Why not create his own?
I swear, sometimes I think things would be easier if we were all just platonists.

[Anonymous No.20569643]

>>20569582
This too. When is it ok to just accept society as it is? Would a hypothetical society whose system has assured its survival need to change in any way other than in the improvement of its functions and purpose?

[Anonymous No.20569696]

>>20566869
No it isn't, Ontology is Metaphysics per se.

[Anonymous No.20569743]

>>20569218
>Coom

[Anonymous No.20570157]

pretty sure schmitt is actually quite popular among leftists

[Anonymous No.20570248]

>>20568761
Correct. I think it has to do with it being summer.

>>20568772
That doesn't prove anything at all, are you an idiot? if you're brown you are much less likely to reveal it on a website where whites are praised and nonwhites are shit on. White people are much more likely to post their hand, browns are much less likely to.

[Anonymous No.20570253]

>>20565850

can you take your r3ddit cliche bullshit back to the midwit hive where you discovered it?

[Anonymous No.20570893]

>>20567222
More like midwits who misread heidegger thought they were following his philosophy. It happens all the time see commies

[Anonymous No.20570896]

>>20565850
>tell me you're X without telling me you're X
Dude please just suck on a tailpipe instead of bothering anybody with reddittranny memes.

[Anonymous No.20571023]

you tradfags are fucking gay cause at the end of the day you cannot part with your bread and circuses cause you're just dopamine junkies

degenerate this, tranny homo that, nigger here leftist there

practice what you preach and disconnect your computer or shut the fuck up

[Anonymous No.20571097]

>>20569631
>>20569582
I believe that thats one of his flaws, since from the root Dasein is being-in-the-world, so it would always end up with the need of an authentic change in the world
>and sounds more like political recruitment than serious philosophy
The humanitarian Marxists like Herbert Marcuse or Gajo Petrovich indeed saw it as political recruitment, but then it was for their own party which they saw as the only correct one

[Anonymous No.20571142]

>>20565852
Fpbp

[Anonymous No.20571175]

>>20571023
This is the only website I browse fren

[Anonymous No.20571209]

>>20565850
tradlarpers are Catholic larper though so those philosophers makes no sense

[Anonymous No.20572588]

>>20565850
PBUH