/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.22892559]

>how do you not know [random fact]??
>that's GENERAL KNOWLEDGE!!
why are you fags like this

[Anonymouṡ No.22892653]

>>22892559
Yes, it's very annoying. Almost as annoying is the passive-aggressive variant where someone posts a picture of an obscure person without bothering to change the filename to his name and then waits like a spider just hoping someone will ask "Who is that?" so he can say "Imagine not knowing who that is!"

[Anonymous No.22892656]

>>22892653
Fpbp

[Anonymous No.22892688]

>>22892559
How do you not have general knowledge in <current year>? There is an authoritative peer reviewed table of general knowledge, updated and expanded: https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-012-0307-9/tables/1 General knowledge isn't that difficult.

[Anonymous No.22892714]

>>22892653
>he doesn’t know
Classic

[Anonymous No.22892723]

/lit/ - Literature.

[Anonymous No.22892858]

>>22892559
no on here talks like that

[Anonymous No.22892865]

>>22892559
test

[Anonymous No.22892887]

>>22892559
This never happens to me but I do it to people all the time. Must mean I have more knowledge than most people.

[Anonymous No.22892899]

>>22892559
I mean I guess somebody has to be below average. Like if this is happening to you on a regular basis it sounds like a "you" problem not a "me" problem.
>inb4 I made you the soijack i won the argument
I have already made myself the yes guy.

[Anonymous No.22892901]

>>22892887
>anon is dumb as a rock, aware of it
>anon learns [random fact]
>anon is ashamed that he didn't know [random fact] beforehand
>anon shames others for not knowing [random fact], projecting his own shame onto others
many such cases

[Anonymous No.22892903]

>>22892899
See >>22892901

[Anonymous No.22892911]

>soijak thread
Didn't even read

[Anonymous No.22893027]

>>22892911
>i don't like the title, therefore I won't read the book
brainlet